Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Penyelesaian Soal Kaidah Pencacahan
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.35719/aritmatika.v2i1.18Keywords:
analisis kesalahan, kaidah pencacahan, penyelesaian soalAbstract
This study aims to identify, explore, sort and categorize the types of student errors of class XII MATIQ As-Surkati Salatiga in solving counting rules questions on the sub-material filling slots, permutations, and combinations. The results of identification of various student errors are used to investigate and determine the factors that cause student errors so that the learning process can be improved. This study uses a descriptive research method with a qualitative approach. The research was conducted at madrasah Tahfidzul Quran As-Surkati by taking 28 students of class XII as the subject for all analysis. The data collection method used documentation study on the result of student’ written test correction on daily assessments and researcher observations as the main instrument with confirmation of the validity of the data through unstructered interviews. The stages of data analysis are as follows, 1) collecting data in the form of daily assessment results for all students, 2) correcting the work results of all students, 3) identifying the types of student work errors, and 4) grouping the types of student work errors. Researchers observed from the time the learning of the counting rules took place to daily assessments. The technique of determining the informants of the respondents who are shown the results of their work uses the criterion sampling method which aims to obtain informants (work results) that match the specified criteria (types of student errors).The results showed that the categories of student error types were misunderstanding of the concept (40%), error in interpreting questions (35%), error in procedures (20%), and error in algebraic operations (5%). Meanwhile, the factors that cause students' errors are, first, difficulty understanding the questions due to the low level of understanding of the concept and the high complexity of the material. The second cause of student error is difficulty in learning the material due to lack of focus when studying, the large amount of learning load, feeling that there is less time to study, and low learning motivation.
References
Books:
As’ari, A. R., Daniel Candra, T., Yuwono, I., & Anwar, L. (2018). Matematika Studi dan Pengajaran. Dinas Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan. Jakarta.
Sugiyono. (2014). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan (Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan R&D. Penerbit Alfabeta. Bandung.
-----------. (2014). Statistika untuk Penelitian. Penerbit Alfabeta. Bandung.
Online journal:
Dinar, A., & Suci, K. (2016). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Matematika Berdasarkan Tahapan Newman. Jurnal EKUIVALEN, 19–24.
Dinar, A., & Suci, K. (2016). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Matematika Berdasarkan Tahapan Newman. Jurnal EKUIVALEN, 19–24.
Fatahillah, A., Wati, Y. F., & Susanto. (2017). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Cerita Matematika berdasarkan Tahapan Newman beserta Bentuk Scaffolding yang diberikan. Kadikma, 8(1), 40–51.
Hastari, R. C., Zuhroh, Y. E., Purwanto, P., & Susiana, A. (2020). Kesalahan Mahasiswa dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Matematika pada Penerapan Model Pembelajaran Langsung (Direct Instruction). Jurnal Tadris Matematika, 3(1), 21–30. https://doi.org/10.21274/jtm.2020.3.1.21-30.
Kusumawardani, D. R., Wardono, & Kartono. (2018). Pentingnya Penalaran Matematika dalam Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Matematika. Prisma, 1(1), 588–595.
Lutvaidah, U., & Hidayat, R. (2019). Pengaruh Ketelitian Membaca Soal Cerita terhadap Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Jurnal Kajian Pendidikan Matematika, 4, 179–188.
Mahyudi, M. (2016). Mengapa Sulit Membedakan Permutasi Dan Kombinasi. AdMathEdu : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Matematika, Ilmu Matematika Dan Matematika Terapan, 6(1). https://doi.org/10.12928/admathedu.v6i1.4760.
Marisa, G., Hariyadi, B., & Syaiful. (2020). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa Dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Operasi Aljabar Berdasarkan Taksonomi SOLO (Analysis of the Errors of Students in completing Algebra Problem Operations Based on SOLO Taxonomy). Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 11(1), 77–88.
Romadiastri, Y. (2016). Analisis Kesalahan Mahasiswa Matematika dalam Menyelesaikan Soal- Soal Logika. Phenomenon : Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA, 2(1), 76. https://doi.org/10.21580/phen.2012.2.1.419.
Theses, Dissertation:
Creswell, J.W. (2012). Educational Research: Planning, Conducting, and Evaluating Quantitative and Qualitative Research (Fourt Edition). Upper Saddle River, NJ: Pearson Education.
Darmawan, A. E. F. (2012). Peran Buku Ajar bagi Guru dalam Proses Pembelajaran Matematika Topik Kaidah Pencacahan di Kelas XI IPA SMA Kolese de Britto. Skripsi, Universitas Sanata Dharma, Yogyakarta.
Nuryadin, A., Abdul, D., Lidinillah, M. (2014). Analysis of Fifth Grade Students ’ Performance in Solving Mathematical Word Problem Using Newman ’ s Procedure. 139–146.
Patton, M. Q. (2002). Qualitative Research & Evaluation Mehods (3 ed.). California: Sage Publishing.
Puspendik. (2018). Ringkasan Eksekutif Hasil Ujian Nasional SMA/MA IPA 2018, Masukan untuk Pembelajaran di Sekolah. https://doi.org/10.1787/a26f6edb-id.
Sulistyaningsih, A., & Rakhmawati, E. (2017). Analisis Kesalahan Siswa menurut Kastolan Dalam Pemecahan Masalah Matematika. Seminar Matematika Dan Pendidikan Matematika UNY, 19(2), 123–130.
Wiliza, Y., Toto, N., & Qohar, A. (2016). Analisis Kesalahan dalam Menyelesaikan Soal Materi Permutasi dan Kombinasi. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Etnomatnesia, 5(2), 177–181.
